Robert Pattinson "Daily Record" Interview A Fabrication   5 comments

Any comments attributed to Robert Pattinson are going to get huge attention, especially with regards to the highly anticipated Bel Ami he’s making with Uma Thurman, and especially if outlets can throw in the word “sex.”

“The sex scenes with Uma are kind of disturbing,” Pattinson is quoted as saying to The Daily Record. The comments were quickly (and not surprisingly) picked up everywhere. “[Thurman’s character] kind of uses sex as a sort of weapon and my character thinks like an animal,” Pattinson supposedly adds.

Bel Ami is an adaptation of French writer Guy de Maupassant’s novel, in which Georges Duroy (Pattinson) is a social climbing journalist and playboy. As Gossip Cop confirmed last month, Christina Ricci has also signed on to the project.

Gossip Cop was told by a source close to Pattinson that the Daily Record interview is a “fabrication.”

The source adds, Pattinson “never spoke to the [Scottish] Daily Record.”

Via Gossip Cop

Posted February 8, 2010 by gittsy in Bel Ami, Robert Pattinson

Tagged with , ,

5 responses to “Robert Pattinson "Daily Record" Interview A Fabrication

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Pingback: uberVU - social comments

  2. http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2010/02/08/robert-pattinson-discusses-the-burden-of-having-no-official-end-date-for-twilight/
    “UPDATE: Following reports from ROBsessed and GossipCOP that the Daily Record story was a fabrication, we reached out to Pattinson’s representation for clarification. The response we got is that he never spoke to them. Consider this “interview” debunked.”

    Mr. Pattinson fan
  3. Hi there

    I’m Iain Hepburn, digital editor at the Daily Record. We have been in touch with GossipCop and MTV following their comments on this story.

    Had they bothered to approach us before running their ‘dismissal’, we would happily have provided confirmation of the veracity of the story.

    We have done so to them today with an audio clip of the interview proving directly that not only was the interview not a fabrication, that it was accurate.

    Likewise, had this website also bothered to get in touch with us, rather than taking the word of a third party, we could have done so.

    I look forward to your retraction of your claims and apology, and trust you will give it the same prominence that you gave displayed the original, inaccurate piece.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.